| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS stack overflow |
| From: | Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 May 2002 11:03:09 -0500 |
| Cc: | Sebastian Kun <seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <0e6d01c2026b$8f2be510$4902a8c0@consensys.com> <3CED08B1.8010401@sgi.com> <001801c2026f$22a52970$4902a8c0@consensys.com> <20020523164915.A32213@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226 |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 11:33:06AM -0400, Sebastian Kun wrote: Yep, I was reworking this, we also do not need the maximum size, just the size of the existing data. There is also one other function which allocates the same array on the stack. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS stack overflow, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS stack overflow, Karl M. Hegbloom |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS stack overflow, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS stack overflow, Karl M. Hegbloom |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |