| To: | "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fragmentation (was: XFS NFS server Oops) |
| From: | Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:26:34 -0500 |
| Cc: | Rupa Schomaker <rupa-list@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <1016578034.28166.25.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203200925430.8497-100000@gusi.leathercollection.ph> <m34rjbhl3e.fsf@shakti.rupa.com> <3CC1EBBA.D7122F0C@berdmann.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226 |
Bernhard R. Erdmann wrote: I've got a filesystem with 28 .iso images, the frags -f command shows: Try running xfs_bmap on those iso images, just give it file names as its parameter. It will report how large the individual chunks of the files are. Assuming say 200Mb in each image, 355 fragments is about 16 Mbytes in each extent. It all depends on how they were written (one after the other or in parallel), and how full the filesystem is, and what state it was in before you wrote them. If you write a few hundred Mbytes into a filesystem which only has small scattered chunks of free space you are going to get a fragmented file, there is no way out of that. Steve
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problem with 2.4.18 kernel + XFS, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.4.18 + XFS 1.1 on multiprocessor: bizzare hard hang on Samba writes., Thor Lancelot Simon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fragmentation (was: XFS NFS server Oops), Bernhard R. Erdmann |
| Next by Thread: | 2.4.18 + XFS 1.1 on multiprocessor: bizzare hard hang on Samba writes., Thor Lancelot Simon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |