xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 10:47:15 -0800
Cc: Tony Gale <gale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>, Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203262227050.17959-100000@chuckle.americas.sgi.com> <3CA179E7.7413F25@ch.sauter-bc.com> <1017235934.29730.6.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com> <1017240266.16216.8.camel@syntax.dstl.gov.uk> <20020327155602.A7730@caldera.de> <1017241257.14218.15.camel@syntax.dstl.gov.uk> <20020327162003.A8199@caldera.de>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> ...
>  - sometimes the core kernel really should be changed.  An example
>    is the missing export of block_flushpage in pre-2.4.18 kernels
>    (or 2.5) - JFS works around this in a way I absoloutly don't like.

That's dumb.  They should just export the damn thing and argue
the case.  The block_flushpage and block_truncate_page functions
need to become address_space operations, in fact.

ext3 probably changed more stuff in the core kernel than
XFS does.  But those changes made sense and were, ahem,
skilfully explained to Linus :)

-


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>