xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: fatal error -- xfs_repair: duplicate inode range

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: fatal error -- xfs_repair: duplicate inode range
From: Michael Best <mbest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:31:49 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <3C96259D.270CEB2E@emergence.com> <1016473250.14540.102.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <3C9628FB.8E3F8B0A@emergence.com> <1016473844.14540.105.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <3C962D50.2E955C9C@emergence.com> <20020319080554.P1601@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for the help Steve and Nathan.

The new 2.4.18-xfs (CVS) kernel with the 2.0.1-0 (CVS) tools, appear to
have done the job.  The filesystem was damaged to the tune of about
13751 files (those moved into lost+found), but otherwise the partition
became useable again.

If there is any interest in the copy of the unrepaired filesystem (16G)
I can make it available, otherwise once I am done rebuilding I will
simply toss it.

-- 
Michael Best
Systems Administrator           ph 780-413-6397 x230
Emergence By Design            fax 780-433-7548
#200, 11209 Jasper Avenue     toll 866-860-2666
Edmonton, Alberta, T5K 0L5

Nathan Scott wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:09:20AM -0700, Michael Best wrote:
> > Steve Lord wrote:
> > > 2.4 CVS - and there are new command rpms on the ftp site too. I think
> > > the 2.4.18 split patches should be immune to this too, but there are
> > > other problems fixed since then - there are no 2.4.19 patches yet.
> > >
> > > Steve
> >
> > I will just use the xfs_repair out of the CVS tree unless the command
> > rpms are a better choice.
> >
> 
> Any 2.0.0+ user tools are fine for 2.4.18 (both of the above are fine).
> 
> cheers.
> 
> --
> Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>