xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfsdump & compression? (was: Re: xfsdump aborts after assertion fai

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfsdump & compression? (was: Re: xfsdump aborts after assertion failure)
From: Ede Wolf <listac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:43:53 +0100
References: <Pine.SGI.4.43.0202181305520.35457-100000@omen.melbourne.sgi.com>
Reply-to: listac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-AT; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020208
If I understand right, star (a tar "successor") is able to handle ACLs and is supposed to have other advantages like improved speed and a fifo buffer. Though not yet personally tested.

http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/glone/employees/joerg.schilling/private/star.html


Info is inside the tarball, none on the page. Just in case you wonder.

Btw.: talking about xfsdump: Is there a tool/addon that writes a tape catalog, so I can locate data without a tape beeing inserted ? The contents of /var/xfsdump seems more some kind of meta-data.Would be really nice to be able to browe some kind of database to see on which tapes what files are located.


Well, if you aren't using ACLs or other extended attribute information,
then you could use any generic backup utility like tar, cpio, bru, etc.
(Hopefully the generic utilities will start handling these things now that
the interfaces are defined.)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>