xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: chown32() weirdness

from [Walt H] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: chown32() weirdness
From: Walt H <waltabbyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:00:41 -0800
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202181038540.17806-100000@chuckle.americas.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202181050220.17806-100000@chuckle.americas.sgi.com> <20020218180643.O22191@fruit.eu.org>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8+) Gecko/20020212
I was more afraid of the setuid, possibe local root exploit. Maybe that would be caught?

-Walt


Wessel Dankers wrote: 
On 2002-02-18 11:02:51-0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:

Ok, I guess this is a difference between Irix and Linux...


Hm. That means I can just push someone over their quota by chowning a big
file to them (especially if it's in a directory they do not have access
to). That doesn't sound right.

Regards,

--
Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Some one needed the powerstrip, so they pulled the switch plug.





[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: chown32() weirdness, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:  Re: chown32() weirdness, Walt H
Previous by Thread:  Re: chown32() weirdness, Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:  Re: chown32() weirdness, Walt H
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]