xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?

Subject: Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?
From: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:54:53 -0700
Cc: XFS Mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111131844270.1348-100000@mustard.heime.net>
Reply-to: stimits@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> 
> > I always use SCSI systems that allow combined writes. But the original
> > post said the drives were U160 scsi; I didn't catch whether this was
> > software RAID or using a hardware controller, but I think it said
> > hardware controller. So that leads to the question of whether the
> > hardware controller is able to spread out reads or writes. (my systems
> > were also all SMP, which might matter, but the 30 MB/sec spec on single
> > drives I mentioned is non-RAID with an intelligent hot swap backplane)
> 
> I've been trying both hw and sw raid. Now, I've got a new controller
> giving me 60MB/sec from a software RAID-0. I haven't tried hw RAID on the
> new controller yet, but I will.
> 
> The system is a Compaq ProLiant DL380: 3-peer PCI system with 1GBps memory
> bus, 1,2GB RAM, 2xPIII1266 and a nice steel-gray 2U-case.

What chipset is the motherboard? And do you have IO-APIC enabled? See if
irq's appear under both cpu's in /proc/interrupts...if they are spread
out on both cpu's it is enabled.

Now you mention a high memory bandwidth, but is this still a standard
PCI slot (thus 33 MHz/32 bit)? If so, it'd be kind of like putting a
fast AGP graphics card in an ordinary PCI slot...it would be a
bottleneck between the higher bandwidth and the card.

D. Stimits, stimits@xxxxxxxxxx

> 
> --
> Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCA
> 
> Computers are like air conditioners.
> They stop working when you open Windows.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>