xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS 1.0.1 Install Problems

Subject: Re: XFS 1.0.1 Install Problems
From: Malcolm Cowe <malcolm_cowe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:24:06 +0100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: Agilent Technologies UK Ltd.
References: <3BD5919D.9EF74294@agilent.com> <1003852549.13566.94.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Not using the boot disk. Might just grab your patched kernel package and
see if I can't shoehorn it in, though.


Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
> Hi Malcolm -
> 
> For starters, you're not booting off the floppy the installer created,
> are you?  The XFS kernel is big enough that the installer usually can't
> fit it on a floppy (yes, a warning would have been good...).
> 
> There are no ext2<->xfs conversion tools.  Backup & restore is the only
> migration path.
> 
> Regarding 2.4.9, I just released a test version of Red Hat's 7.1 update
> kernel, with the latest XFS bits merged.
> 
> -Eric
> 
> On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 10:49, Malcolm Cowe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've spent part of today trying to install an XFS enabled RH 7.1
> > distribution based on your ISO cdrom image. However, when the system
> > reboots after the install completes, I get the following error just
> > after the kernel uncompresses:
> >
> > invalid compressed format
> >   -- System halted
> >
> > >From searching the Web, there doesn't appear to be any conclusive
> > discussion about what this error means. The most likely answer is that
> > the kernel image has been corrupted, but I don't know how that could be
> > -- I put a separate 32MB /boot partition right at the start of the disk,
> > and use ext2 for it.
> >
> > I'm using a NetServer LH3000 from HP with a NetRAID 2M card configured
> > for 2x36GB disks in RAID 1. I have tried installing a stock RH system
> > with the same file system layout, and it succeeds. If I have to create
> > my own kernel image, are there any fs conversion tools to help me? Also,
> > which kernel revision would you recommend (we are sticking with 2.4.9
> > for the most part since it appears more stable than the newer releases)?
> 
> --
> Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
> sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>