|Subject:||Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser|
|From:||Buchan Milne <bgmilne@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:02:15 +0200|
|References:||<20011022122106.A12279@bistro.marx> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3BD45AAB.2D75ACAC@illusionary.com>|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011014|
Derek Glidden wrote:
No, but this is what Civileme (the highly-respected-in-Mandrake-circles QA manager at Mandrakesoft) posted on the Mandrakeforum:Eric Sandeen wrote:
It is interesting to see here that:
1)Mandrake considers XFS better for general use than ReiserFS, which they have shipped with since 7.1
2)Mandrake considers JFS (1.0.4) unstable, I am not sure if they actually disabled JFS in the installer or not ....
3)Ext3 is by far the slowest of the 3 Journalling FS's availble, and only has one advantage - easy migration from ext2.
That said, I am still sitting with the majority of our data on ReiserFS, until I have enough spare disk space to migrate to XFS (ACLs would be really convenient right now ....)
AFAIK XFS and Ext3 are both in -ac kernels now?
This is not for the faint-of-heart ... After taking a look at the kernel in Mandrake's cooker at:
you will notice that there are a lot of patches for XFS and JFS against 2.4.12-ac3 .....
-- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 ext 202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: Who / What's using Linux XFS?, Will Francis|
|Next by Date:||TAKE - Correct find next bit on 64 bit architectures, Keith Owens|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser, Justin Coffey|
|Next by Thread:||Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser, Andrew Morton|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|