| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Patch handling |
| From: | Gerd Bitzer <gbitzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Oct 2001 22:11:16 +0200 |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 |
Hello, may be that are stupid questions, but anyway. What is the correct way to handle your kernel patches ? Can I download a linux 2.4.5 source tree and your 1.0.1 patch and apply it, and after this only apply the official kernelpatches against the kernel sources, to patch up to newer kernel releases ? Or do I have to maintain a clean kernelsource tree, which I can patch up to the newest kernel release, and after this procedure can patch in your appropriate kernel patch ? Is there a way (when using xfs as module) not to patch it into the original kernel source, but only to compile it ? I do not want to maintain an original kernel source tree which I am able to patch up to newer kernel versions and an additional version, where I have patched an appropriate version of xfs into, I only want to have original kernel sources which I can use as I need, I do not want to have extra work with an extra xfs kernel. I think xfs is the most advanced filesystem around, when will it be in the official kernel source tree ? keep up the good work
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: HELP!!!, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Patch handling, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | xfs into base kernel, Sipos Ferenc |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Patch handling, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |