| To: | Nigel Kukard <nkukard@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: most stable kernel + XFS version? |
| From: | "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Oct 2001 02:05:20 +0200 |
| Cc: | Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110142356420.1797-100000@ctgw.lbsd.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> which would the developers choose as being the most stable kernel version to > use on a production server? let me try that and see if i have the same > problem and work from there. I've several systems running well with 2.4.10-xfs. .11 and .12 didn't last long enough, so stay away. 2.4.7-xfs was ok as I remember. I'm just testing with 2.4.13-pre2-xfs. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Total fs corruption, Nigel Kukard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Total fs corruption, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
| Previous by Thread: | most stable kernel + XFS version?, Nigel Kukard |
| Next by Thread: | Re: most stable kernel + XFS version?, erich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |