| To: | kris buggenhout <buggenkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bad superblock, no secondary |
| From: | saveme <saveme@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Sep 2001 19:54:16 +0930 |
| Cc: | "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3BAB1035.7040203@fornax.net> <3BAB12C1.7FA57C8A@god.bel.alcatel.be> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010913 |
kris buggenhout wrote: IMHO a RAID controller is not a safeguard that eliminates the need for backup... Yeah, so I have found. Learning the hard way can be expensive ... ;) Well, work can pay for the bandwidth, and most of the really important code is actually backed up - it's just all the MP3s and personal code that you collect over the years - it's not impossible to live without it, but I doubt I will feel quite right using my computer for some time.... :-( Thanks anyhoo! Cheers, Andrew Hill. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bad superblock, no secondary, kris buggenhout |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: question concerning upgrades, Gunnar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bad superblock, no secondary, kris buggenhout |
| Next by Thread: | kernel error for xfs_force_shutdown ?, Tommy Wu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |