| To: | Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CPU usage |
| From: | Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:23:59 +0200 |
| >received: | from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566BB57306; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:24:00 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Sauter AG, Basel |
| References: | <1000513075.12917.104.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Florin Andrei schrieb: > > I've heard someone complaining about high CPU usage with XFS, especially > on low-clocked machines. > Someone told me that, on some PII at 266 and 400 MHz, running Linux on > XFS, CPU usage is 10-15% all the time, even when the machine is supposed > to be idle. > I find this hard to believe, since on a lowly Indy, at 180 MHz, CPU > usage is 0.00% when the machine is idle. > Any idea?... I have been running Linux on XFS on a Pentium 200 with 64Mb Ram, four IDE disks with Software Raid5 and LVM. This system was not so fast but when there was no load CPU usage almost 0%. I guess there is something else wrong with your systems. -Simon > > -- > Florin Andrei > > "Our kernel does have source control: its name is > Linus Torvalds, CVS with a brain." - Nicholas Knight |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - linux-xfs, handle bulkstat_single failure in xfsdump, Ivan Rayner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfsdump with rmt, Ethan Benson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CPU usage, Ries van twisk |
| Next by Thread: | Hard drive light won't go off?, Mike Burger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |