xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Patch comments.

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Patch comments.
From: Peter Wächtler <pwaechtler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 18:33:45 +0200
Organization: B16
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109080227200.1552-100000@dms.digistar.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Alan Brown wrote:
> 
> 1: Judicious use of the --exclude-from directive will keep your patch
>    virgin vs third party stuff you may have incorporated to your source
>    tree.
> 
> Right now your filesystem patch is fundamentally incompatible with
> things like Alan Cox's jumbo patches because of this.
> 
> Also your inclusion of non-related code may interfere with application
> of other single patches people may be applying.
> 
> 2: Why submit these to Linus? The guy is snowed under and has more
>    pressing priorities right now in his life than including patches to
>    stable code (other than bugfixes).
> 
> You're really better off cleaning up your patches and feeding them to
> Alan Cox. There's a large pool of ac-testers out there, your code will
> get tested and debugged faster this way and you'll end up in the
> mainstream kernel tree that much more quickly.

I want to second this.
New functionality like drivers or even filesystems should first be
included in the -ac series of the Linux kernel.
The other option would be to include it in 2.5 - but this will give
you: no xfs in "user" kernel for the next year ;)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>