Nathan Scott wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:27:27AM -0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > [root@dm 121212]# setfacl -d -x u:dm 1111
> > setfacl: 1111: Resulting default ACL
> > `user::rwx,group::rwx,other::rwx,mask::rwx': Missing or wrong entry at
> > entry 4
> >
> > What mean this error?
> >
> > I can't understand :(
> >
>
> In reply to your initial question, I wrote (and I quote):
>
> "[...] getfacl/setfacl [...] were designed for just this
> purpose. There is a known ACE ordering bug in the libacl code
> that this sits above though, so YMMV at the moment. Feel free
> to fix the problem, its just not reached the top of anyone's
> ToDo list here at the moment."
>
> So if you are not prepared to fix or work around this bug yourself,
> don't use getfacl/setfacl with XFS yet.
>
Oops! , sorry, I forgot about this :(
Thank you!
|