"P.Dixon" schrieb:
>
> Hello,
>
> Any idea why xfs appears to be very much slower than reiserfs with these
> benchmarks:
>
> http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks/mongo/2.4.5-xfs-ext2_vs_reiserfs.html
>
> Admittedly, the benchmarks were done by namesys...
Maybe we have to ask Mindcraft for serious benchmarks :-)
ReiserFS is good in handling large amount of small files, specially
deleting them goes fast. That's all about it. The overall performance
in real life is allmost the same with both filesystems. Its only
one spcific situation where ReiserFS is really faster, but compare
recovery time of both filesystems after a crash, XFS shows some 100%
better perfomance than ReiserFS!
Forget about benchmarks, run your on real life test and
compare and cpu usage.
Simon
>
> --
>
> Paul
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Paul Dixon Email: P.Dixon@xxxxxxxxx
> Department of Physics Phone: (020) 7882 5054
> Queen Mary, University of London Fax : (020) 7882 5054
> Mile End Road, London E1 4NS URL : http://hepwww.ph.qmw.ac.uk/~pd
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Simon Matter Tel: +41 61 695 57 35
Fr.Sauter AG / CIT Fax: +41 61 695 53 30
Im Surinam 55
CH-4016 Basel [mailto:simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
|