xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs 1.0.1 and linux 2.4.6

To: alan@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfs 1.0.1 and linux 2.4.6
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:39:33 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <2bdb5efac4f0ea174353dc2735a93456@freemail.cotse.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
The XFS merge from 2.4.5 to 2.4.6 was non-trivial, luckily we had smart
guys like Steve and Keith around to do it.  :)  If you're starting with
the patch manpage, you may be in for a lot of work.

I do plan to put out 2.4.6 patches, but I'd like to expose them to some
internal testing before we slap "1.0.1" on it.  After I get a bit of
confidence in them, I can put them out as "testing."

-Eric

alan@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Not to sound too bleeding edge, but I would like to begin a test project for 
> work that involves, among other things, xfs as the filesystem.
> I see that there is an 8.0 mb patch difference between linux 2.4.5 and 2.4.6, 
> so I'd prefer using the latter. The nfs and memory fixes that occurred in the 
> days since the 2.4.6 patch was created and 2.4.5 1.0.1 release are what I am 
> interested in really.
> 
> Alternatively, does anyone know how I might convert a 2.4.5-xfs patched 
> kernel to 2.4.6?  After perusing manpages for patch, diff, and diff3, I 
> haven't a clue as to how I could create a patch for one modified kernel 
> version, that would take one set of modifications (xfs) and apply them to 
> what is essentially a foriegn environment (2.4.6) for it.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>