xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Samba panic with ACLs

To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Samba panic with ACLs
From: Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx (Juergen Hasch)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:07:04 +0200
Cc: jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <3B2F91DE.B3D2AEE1@t-online.de> <XFMail.20010619165236.jtrostel@connex.com> <20010620105507.O280523@boing.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

Timothy Shimmin schrieb:
> 
> Hi Juergen and John,
> 
> I think it should be changed to malloc() space for the
> qualifier as Juergen suggested.
> 
> The pseudo standard is hard to read as normal (IMHO:),
> but it does indicate that we should call acl_free() when
> we are done with it. (It does say to do this if it is releasable
> memory - but how is the caller supposed to know whether it is
> or isn't).
> 
> So we have no choice if we are supposed to call acl_free().
> I will change it unless someone can convince me otherwise :)

This is what I was thinking of, I believe it's the right way
to do so.
A big thank you for adding it so quick !!

...Juergen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>