xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS: SGI or Linux

To: Maurice Volaski <mvolaski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS: SGI or Linux
From: Ric Tibbetts <ric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:36:34 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <a05100303b73c4a85db5f@[129.98.91.150]>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9) Gecko/20010505
Maurice Volaski wrote:

I know this is an unusual question for the list, but I hoping to get the perspective of people who are on both sides of the fence...
The endpoint is a highly stable box to serve files (appleshare, smb and maybe nfs) from a hardware raid (up to 2TB).
If one had a choice between a reasonably equipped PC with the latest Linux and XFS versus a new SGI box (similarly configured) running the latest IRIX (which has XFS), which one would you choose? Would you change your answer in six months?

This depends on what you're going to use the box for, and what the loads will be (how many users, how much smb/nfs/apple traffic will there be?). If the loads will be high (200+ users, then you might do well to look at a risc solution (Be that SGI/IBM/HP/Sun ...). If the loads will be low, then you can save some cash, and use Intel hardware.


Personally, If I was just looking to build a disk farm, with high capacity, I'd look at either an HP, or possibly a Sun solution (disk farms really aren't SGI's strength.. (sorry SGI!).

So the answer I'd give is:
There's not enough information here to give an answer. :)

Ric



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>