Seth Mos wrote:
> At 22:59 12-5-2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >Tom Duffy wrote:
> > > I was wondering what the smallest memory system somebody has tried XFS
> > > on. The webpage says 64MB minimum and I know that I have seen XFS working
> > > on 64MB, but I was wondering, will 32MB be ok? How about 16MB w/ swap?
> > >
> > > Ananth told me that the recovery was the most memory intensive part...so,
> > > I would like to know if anybody has gone through a recovery on a low
> > > memory system and things have been OK...or not?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> >So here is an aging machine for you...
> >32meg p90... just fast enough to run xmms :-)
> >Yes hard to believe I'm actually running a linux box at home.
> I have a Pentium 233 MMX with 32MB ram and a 20GB disk that seems to do
> fine recovering from a reboot.
> It isn't really fast but it's a small MySQL database server that needs the
> uptime more then it does speed. It will never be hit very hard.
> I have not tried a 486 yet but I will see if it works someday. If I get
> Mips on the Cobalt Qube2 going again I will test that one too :-)
Is there a 2.4 version of the kernel for qube?
I have one sitting in my office not doing anything... it would be nice
to toss XFS and a fiber channel card in the the thing and turn it
into something useful.
> Every program has two purposes one for which
> it was written and another for which it wasn't
> I use the last kind.