| To: | K Mitchell Russell <kmrussel@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 09 May 2001 13:29:10 -0500 |
| Cc: | utz lehmann <xfs@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.A41.4.10.10105091416040.12300-100000@comet.vcu.edu> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
K Mitchell Russell wrote: > Interestingly, I booted into linux rescue off the RH7.1 XFS 1.0 iso a > couple days ago, and found xfs_check and xfs_repair to run fine. Are > there two versions of the 1.0 iso released? No, although there are several -testX releases. Utz, are you sure you have the REAL 1.0? TRANS.TBL in the root dir should be dated April 27. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS + RSBAC, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: nfsd from kernel 2.4.4 oops, Fermin Molina |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |