> IMO XFS has more features and is better supported than any
> other *stable* jfs.
>
> This is only my personal opinion, I don't want to star a flame
> war regarding which filesystem is better.
Now when you mentioned it ...
Has anyone done a thorough comparison of what Linux has to offer at the
journaling filesystems? I'm thinking of a stability/features/performance
comparison of ext3, jfs, xfs, reiserfs ... At the reiserfs site i can
find only the reiserfs vs ext[2|3] comparison, with the obvious outcome.
I'd be particulary interested at nfs performance and 2Gb+ filesizes.
If someone has something, please come up with it. It'll spare me a few
days doing all the testing on my own.
--
Jure Pecar
|