Re: setfacl fix

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 18, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 03:38:09PM -0600, Steve French wrote:
>> Makes sense to add a setfacl/getfacl test to xfstest and was trying to
>> build updated xfstests and look at what has changed but ran into a
>> strange error building xfstests and didn't see an obvious answer when
>> googling for it.  Any idea how to workaround the build failure?
>> 
>> Building src
>>    [DEP]
>>    [CC]    dirstress
>> gcc: error: /lib64/libhandle.so: Too many levels of symbolic links
>> 
>> 
>> These are the steps I went through from a fairly clean Fedora 19 64
>> system before the make failure:
> 
> No idea.  Maybe some of the RedHat people on the xfs list have more
> experience with Fedora than I have.
> 
Just FWIW fedora has xfsprogs-devel and xfsprogs-qa-devel rpms which should 
satisfy xfstests for that part of the deps.  I've not done a qa-install 
manually on fedora since forever...

Eric