| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: can xfs_repair guarantee a complete clean filesystem? |
| From: | hank peng <pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:36:11 +0800 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xlKPUh8yrE+60A92tIIMGbTm+P3hluhTvP9xurJjG+Y=; b=RMf7cS+7le/2G+tV68M82pTRSE7Glc0wEaJ4AxumvJnAH1W2vavhBCJf+ZJkgdvxWk btbMQw2wlSgO9tTk3IOc581Yr67RM/1hahdBLqj/BYo+6WaX+SO/nwPncmwAkrnKclww 6tiOnsOLA8Zv7jnm3v4CjmZAbaDpnP7R0G814= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pPMty/e/dpn0rp4sDEsFYISESJEC3Kk0grYcL7pLj9TvyK3Xige5TKJ0IPo+Ldjqg6 ERBc0f9qPKPmgAJNO3oCjMjLT/9hE62L4RfyYkBTTzB/v1uVyxWdsuhEkgi0MjNO5AAm ybRiJNKFWy/KWYHd9cFtE1+vhuo0CA9hzEkNI= |
| In-reply-to: | <4B15BE1C.2030209@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <389deec70911301805j37df7397l1c3ddbbad7e91768@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B14936F.7040401@xxxxxxxxxxx> <389deec70911302037v19764c2cr7686b353c5e933fa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B14B077.5090500@xxxxxxxxxxx> <389deec70911302234v2fc792ddt54bf88f5200500be@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B152BAD.1000004@xxxxxxxxxxx> <389deec70912010732o72edd3c4q196088a1c01b801e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B1539C6.90000@xxxxxxxxxxx> <389deec70912011646y682a2cc2rd5d4ea8cfe78d2f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B15BE1C.2030209@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
2009/12/2 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > hank peng wrote: >> 2009/12/1 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > ... > >>>> kernel version is 2.6.23, xfsprogs is 2.9.7, CPU is MPC8548, powerpc arch. >>>> I am at home now, Maybe I can provide some detailed information tomorrow. >>> If there's any possibility to test newer kernel & userspace, that'd >>> be great. Many bugs have been fixed since those versions. >>> >> We did have plan to upgrade kernel to latest 2.6.31. > > Well, I'm just suggesting testing it for now, not necessarily > upgrading your product. Would just be good to know if the bug you > are seeing persists upstream on ppc. > Sad, our test engineer had deleted that damaged filesystem, I have to reproduce test again and wait for it to happen. I will replace newer kernel to test immediately when this problem occure again and let you know ASAP. >> BTW, Is there some place where I can check those fixed bug list across >> versions? > > You can look at the changelogs on kernel.org, for instance: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.32 > > Or with git, git log --pretty-oneline fs/xfs > > There isn't a great bug <-> commit <-> kernelversion mapping, I guess. > > -Eric > >>> -Eric > > -- The simplest is not all best but the best is surely the simplest! |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: can xfs_repair guarantee a complete clean filesystem?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Does xfs automatically support acl without needing a mount/fstab option?, Michael Lueck |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: can xfs_repair guarantee a complete clean filesystem?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: can xfs_repair guarantee a complete clean filesystem?, hank peng |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |