| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: can xfs_repair guarantee a complete clean filesystem? |
| From: | hank peng <pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:37:42 +0800 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aNRPykzaJCrlBduvDWdxnP8OBBswZgYxDh/bYAofUbI=; b=Uqe3DjflT+3GW65jHLEBM/EVRVBlfMwoSU8vXpTDeGkygqYmACz9wBQ6+fhJ56JD7S SmdzNdjFF74SL9/e9xGM6N0Vmh7eyPrRfbG5VLjlZhuzqHk+X2FW3vhmRnkCSIiYabMz kcxYjhSZh+m4azSCPkbaMXaGeYzJJw1I83/rs= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=t7ODj11wO4CFVX9MiD0TF/aW42nl8RtjrkIeRyXzWLvqRCQB/KoQa3ciB5+inLdgCu RAR0ekCfFK/bb9a0PRTjoRv2ZfslGBDnfB9j4Qprij+6vpfAwamyNcR6zDaWKfZT6qAU HfqkgFKmgCcfmK+5S+/dgQEhCSxUK8B0q0p5k= |
| In-reply-to: | <4B14936F.7040401@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <389deec70911301805j37df7397l1c3ddbbad7e91768@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B14936F.7040401@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
2009/12/1 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > hank peng wrote: >> When using xfs_repair, I want my XFS filesystem complete clean and >> continue to work even if some files lost. Becase we use XFS in low-end >> NAS box, customers want a tool to repair the filesystem when it has >> problem and they allow some files be lost and don't want the whole >> system to stop. >> So, I wonder if xfs_repair or some other tools can satisfy this funciton? >> > > Yes, that is exactly its purpose (any potential bugs notwithstanding...) > Thanks for your reply. Is there some points I should notice about when using xfs_repair? I used to encounter some cases in which xfs_repair complete successfully but some errors like "Corrupt in memory detected" occured when the filesytem is put into online for short time. Should I reboot the machine and use xfs_repair before the damaged filesystem is used, or some other options I should use? In addition, I googled some information and found that some people say xfs_check should be used before xfs_repair, is it right? > -Eric > -- The simplest is not all best but the best is surely the simplest! |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Trace Enquiries, Harry Lipton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: can xfs_repair guarantee a complete clean filesystem?, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: can xfs_repair guarantee a complete clean filesystem?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: can xfs_repair guarantee a complete clean filesystem?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |