| To: | "'Steve Lord'" <lord@xxxxxxx>, Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: New Kernel RPMs |
| From: | Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:02:33 +0100 |
| Cc: | "'Eric Sandeen'" <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>> But then it wouldn't be an 'official' release (1.0.2) anymore, would it? > > But then why would we bother with the redhat update at all? Same > argument applies in my mind. OK, you're right, but what I was trying to say is that I (and most others) have been using the code from rel 1.0.2 without any troubles, so I prefer to use that 'proven' code. From _your_ point of view though I can imagine you would like to include the fixes. Regards, Matthijs van der Klip [[HTML alternate version deleted]] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: New Kernel RPMs, Matthijs van der Klip |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: New Kernel RPMs, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: New Kernel RPMs, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | RE: New Kernel RPMs, Matthijs van der Klip |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |