xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: New Kernel RPMs

To: "'Steve Lord'" <lord@xxxxxxx>, Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: New Kernel RPMs
From: Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:02:33 +0100
Cc: "'Eric Sandeen'" <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> But then it wouldn't be an 'official' release (1.0.2) anymore, would it?
> 
> But then why would we bother with the redhat update at all? Same
> argument applies in my mind.

OK, you're right, but what I was trying to say is that I (and most others)
have been using the code from rel 1.0.2 without any troubles, so I prefer
to use that 'proven' code. From _your_ point of view though I can imagine
you would like to include the fixes.


Regards,

Matthijs van der Klip


[[HTML alternate version deleted]]


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>