| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation) |
| From: | Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:38:10 -0700 |
| Delivered-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20130729000247.GA13468@dastard> <32553786.2492.1375056392388.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130729024105.GC13468@dastard> |
| User-agent: | slrn/0.9.9p1 (Linux) |
On 2013-07-29, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The "version" of XFS that you are running is that of the > kernel you are running. i.e. 2.6.32-279.x.y or 2.6.32-358.x.y. Can't you fairly easily replace a kernel module with a different version using something like DKMS? I feel like I did that with xfs a few months ago. If accurate, then it's theoretically possible to run a different version of the xfs kernel module than the running kernel version. (And if I'm misremembering then there really is no spoon!) --keith -- kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | hello from adoptashot, adopt a shot |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation), Stan Hoeppner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation), Dave Howorth |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation), Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |