On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:54:23 -0500,
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 17:22, Keith Owens wrote:
>> Both CVS and the split patches are generated from the SGI internal XFS
>> tree. That tree is still at 2.4.21, I cannot generate split patches
>> for 2.4.22 until there is an official[*] SGI internal version of XFS
>> for 2.4.22.
>>
>> [*] I know about Russell Cattelan's patches for 2.4.22 XFS but AFAIK
>> they have not been blessed by the SGI XFS team. Hint, hint.
>What I'm still part of the XFS team, well for another month anyways. :-)
>
>There has been some question of the directio support in 2.4.22 but it
>involved parallel access to the same file via different threads,
>at this point it has not proved to be broken just not as fast as it
>could be.
I am happy to generate split patches for 2.4.22 against Russell's
patches, being very careful to mark them as unofficial 2.4.22 patches.
With one proviso, that the code actually works.
I have not run any QA tests on Russell's patches. If any of the SGI
XFS team tell me that these patches pass QA then I will generate
unofficial 2.4.22 split patches.
|