On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:36:23 -0400 (EDT),
Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Zeitgeist wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 18:42, Net Llama! wrote:
>> > On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Martin Spott wrote:
>> >
>> > On the good news front, a person who wishes to remain anonymous told me
>> > that everything should be back on the server within a few days, once SGI's
>> > legal dept puts together a statement.
>>
>> Why is SGI bending their ass over for these losers?
>
>I can't answer that question, because i don't work for SGI. If i had to
>speculate, i'd say its primarily because SGI is alot smaller (and
>unfortunately, less stable) of a company than IBM.
For SGI's response, see http://oss.sgi.com/letter_100103.txt
Paragraphs 4 and 5 answer this question.
Not speaking for SGI, IANAL, etc.
|