| To: | Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Daily XFS CVS snapshots? |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 May 2001 23:28:59 +1000 |
| Cc: | Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Sat, 19 May 2001 23:44:46 +0800." <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105192341020.881-100000@kalapati.jijo.local> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 19 May 2001 23:44:46 +0800 (PHT), Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >I heard CVSup is a more efficient way of doing things, but I followed the >instructions in the XFS website and did a CVSup but found that it was >downloading a LOT of files too many. Why? I investigated and found it was >downloading every file in the tree with a ",v" appended at the end of the >filename. Those are the CVS history files for each source file. If you are going to use a CVS based system then you have to accept that download the first time. After that you only get the changes, either by cvs update or CVSup. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Daily XFS CVS snapshots?, Federico Sevilla III |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: devfs and fstab, Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | Daily XFS CVS snapshots?, Federico Sevilla III |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Daily XFS CVS snapshots?, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |