| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Valid Benchmark Value & Methods |
| From: | Martin Steigerwald <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 07 May 2015 13:48:34 +0200 |
| Cc: | Dewangga <dewanggaba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <554B4B59.6000706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <554B4B59.6000706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/4.14.7 (Linux/4.0.1-tp520-btrfs-trim-norace+; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; git-38b5d90; 2015-04-16) |
Am Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2015, 18:24:09 schrieb Dewangga: > Hello! > > I'm new on XFS and curious about any tune/tweak regarding XFS > filesystem on any raid array, non-raid, ssd or non-ssd. But, is there > any valid value to determine about the performance? At least valid > benchmark result (eg. using fio with some parameters, or any method). > > Then, about bsize, sectsz, etc, is there any wiki/guidelines how to > set them on a right way? Read and understand: http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_I_want_to_tune_my_XFS_filesystems_for_.3Csomething.3E then, if you want any concrete recommendation ask about your intended setup. Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Valid Benchmark Value & Methods, Dewangga |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Valid Benchmark Value & Methods, Martin Steigerwald |
| Previous by Thread: | Valid Benchmark Value & Methods, Dewangga |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Valid Benchmark Value & Methods, Martin Steigerwald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |