| To: | Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Automatic detection of O(1) scheduler in latest kdb |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 09 Apr 2003 12:11:23 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Tue, 08 Apr 2003 11:28:54 -0400." <3E92EAB6.6020409@myrealbox.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003 11:28:54 -0400, Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >According to the ChangLog, the kdb code now has automatic >recognition support for the O(1) scheduler. However, in >kdb_bt.c, there is an ungaurded "init_tasks". This causes >problems for users of O(1), because the scheduler removes >init_tasks in favor of something else. Just thought I'd >report this. It depends which O(1) scheduler you are using, there are multiple variants. In the version that SGI use on the Altix boxes, init_tasks still exists. However this has got to be enough of a nuisance that the next version of kdb will drop init_tasks and use its own data areas to track the idle tasks. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Automatic detection of O(1) scheduler in latest kdb, Nicholas Wourms |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | FWD: fsck in background?, Greg Freemyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Automatic detection of O(1) scheduler in latest kdb, Nicholas Wourms |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Automatic detection of O(1) scheduler in latest kdb, Nicholas Wourms |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |