| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | XFS Journal on md device |
| From: | "Chris Seufert" <seufert@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:40:41 +1000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=FAT7voeByA4avheKvdU2pG6/KUPHIWwVW7uk8qbZMhN097c1H0VvZJk9RiyJTxCf0N34nZUAKZ1QsUSzal9Jw8Zw3KlF4IXuO7Vi3lfOGFIVxi6ACb7/KJnR7wB9WZG05ONWBKaB5dplSipZcRuF3ZN097EihEkOab9Vr/HPIbw= |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hey, I currently have a 2.1Tb xfs partition, sitting on a hardware SATA raid card. However i also have 2 hdd's (for OS etc) in software raid1, with a md device for the xfs log file. Its a 100mb RAID1 (under /dev/md4), now when i halt/reboot the box, even after the xfs partition is unmounted (as part of the shutdown sequence as normal on debian etch) the /dev/md4 device cant be cleanly stopped. Is having the log on a redundant partition a good idea or is it better to leave it as an internal log or is there another way round this problem. -Chris |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kernel Ooops, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [xfs-masters] Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4-mm3 2/2] fs/xfs: Converting into generic boolean, Richard Knutsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [xfs-masters] Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4-mm3 2/2] fs/xfs: Converting into generic boolean, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS Journal on md device, martin f krafft |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |