xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Kernel Ooops

from [Chris Seufert] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Kernel Ooops
From: "Chris Seufert" <seufert@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:30:25 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T3mdH0vnK4Ux55XJTY2Bw2bGJ1Ab5iexjJSzvGsLOJiw1dtRjhT3rDIRPpB0sCyya2DtkIa1yCELhrL0V6TogKbGASKduJ734+C9+eOdUInSCNcE0u6oFnDUmixF+/927aqxngvVQ0zBTNMcaHZ/971Sy3+pzAEkjdZWEF6xYs8=
In-reply-to: <20060906083028.I3365803@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <2260b150609050427p3123cb85q5af484d8b907e6ac@mail.gmail.com> <20060906083028.I3365803@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Just installed -rc5, all seems well.

Should i be running a fsck after these types of errors?

On 9/6/06, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> wrote: 
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:27:04PM +1000, Chris Seufert wrote:
> I have had this one before, and i had assumed it had been fixed.
>
> System seems very stable running ext3, so i dont 'think' its hardware
> related, but i am begining to wonder.

This is fixed, what kernel version are you using?  (it was fixed
in -rc5/6 IIRC).

> RIP  [<ffffffff8031dd16>] xfs_btree_init_cursor+0x48/0x1bd

cheers.

--
Nathan



[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [xfs-masters] Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4-mm3 2/2] fs/xfs: Converting into generic boolean, Nathan Scott
Next by Date:  Re: Kernel Ooops, Nathan Scott
Previous by Thread:  Re: Kernel Ooops, Nathan Scott
Next by Thread:  Re: Kernel Ooops, Nathan Scott
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]