| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_fsr (defragmenting) 'XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=xxxxxx: Invalid argument' error |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:15:48 +0100 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tom Crane <T.Crane@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20120215013217.GK14132@dastard> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <4F3AAC04.5090400@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120215002811.GM7479@dastard> <20120215013217.GK14132@dastard> |
| User-agent: | KMail/4.7.2 (Linux/3.1.9-1.4-desktop; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2012, 12:32:17 schrieb Dave Chinner: > Well, that shows how slow the XFS mailing list can be at times. I > found Eric's reply in this thread in an internet archive via google > before it arrived in my inbox. IOWs, the the mail archive site > received it, published it and google crawled it before the XFS list > finished distributing the mail to all recipiants.... Maybe they are not using XFS as their mail spool dir filesystem? ;-) -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services: Protéger http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ?, Richard Ems |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ?, Richard Ems |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr (defragmenting) 'XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=xxxxxx: Invalid argument' error, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 0/9] quota updates V2, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |