xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Lsf-pc] LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals

To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals
From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:34:55 +0100
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "lsf-pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lsf-pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20161208122619.GA26535@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1480601506.2511.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1481122626.2354.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20161208122619.GA26535@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
On Thu 08-12-16 13:26:19, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 07-12-16 06:57:06, James Bottomley wrote:
> [...]
> > Just on this point, since there seems to be a lot of confusion: lsf-pc
> > is the list for contacting the programme committee, so you cannot
> > subscribe to it.
> > 
> > There is no -discuss equivalent, like kernel summit has, because we
> > expect you to cc the relevant existing mailing list and have the
> > discussion there instead rather than expecting people to subscribe to a
> > new list.
> 
> There used to be lsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Is it not active
> anymore?

No sure about the current state but usually it gets populated by the
selected attendees each year.

                                                                Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>