xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS reflink and development tip git trees updated

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS reflink and development tip git trees updated
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:27:26 -0700
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, amir73il@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160927052344.GD3059@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20160905053317.GA15302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160919161100.GA19849@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160920043942.GE10172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160927052344.GD3059@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:23:44PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Ok, here's this week's for-4.9 branch:
> 
> https://github.com/djwong/linux/tree/for-dave-for-4.9-5
> https://github.com/djwong/xfsprogs/tree/for-dave-for-4.9-5
> 
> The kernel tree includes Christoph's fixes for copy-on-write,
> refactoring of a refcount btree function to use _btree_query_range (and
> inclusion of the required diff_two_keys/init_high_key helpers), and
> removal of the (totally broken) always_cow debug switch.  It also
> contains a new error injection point to make reflink fail with ENOSPC.

Are you going to send out the patches to the list?  Also it seems like
the writeback updates weren't folded in but just added to the end,
was that intentional?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>