xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 16/71] xfs: log refcount intent items

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/71] xfs: log refcount intent items
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:40:54 -0700
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160911125246.GA1399@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <147216791538.867.12413509832420924168.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <147216802075.867.12945255918683675311.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160906152155.GJ24287@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160908191404.GB8969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160908231326.GA30056@dastard> <20160908231656.GC8969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160911125246.GA1399@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 05:52:46AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 04:16:56PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > Carfeul there - enums are not defined to have a fixed size and so
> > > can change from compiler version to compiler version. IOWs, the
> > > enum values can be written idirectly to an on-disk structure, but
> > > the on-disk structure should not be using the enum as the type
> > > definition for whatever gets stored on disk.
> > 
> > <nod>  I left the fields (and the #define flags) definitions alone,
> > so it's only writing enum values indirectly into a fixed size (u32)
> > variable on-disk.
> > 
> > i.e. I'm not using enums in the on-disk structure definitions.
> 
> now add a byte swap for the flags and everything should be fine.
> The whole idea of architecture-dependent log items was a horrible
> idea, and I still have hopes of fixing it eventually.

There are other fields in the CUI/BUI log items that would also
need byte swapping.  Not so hard to fix now, though fixing the
EFI/RUI/everythingelse will have to be part of that future patchset.

<shrug> I also have a vague memory of Dave telling me not to worry
about making the log item fields arch-independent...

--D

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>