xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to 800b269

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to 800b269
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:23:08 +1000
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160829145249.GF22760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20160826062508.GG19025@dastard> <20160826074844.GA17137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160829013111.GN19025@dastard> <20160829145249.GF22760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:52:49AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:31:12AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:48:44AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> > > 
> > > please consider: "[PATCH] iomap: don't set FIEMAP_EXTENT_MERGED for
> > > extent based filesystems"
> > > 
> > > for 4.8.  It fixes a regression in the iomap-based fiemap
> > > implementation, and it's fairly trivial as well.
> > 
> > Oh, damn, I thought I got that one. I'll append it to the
> > series and push it out.
> 
> It might be a good idea to pick up "xfs: track log done items directly
> in the deferred pending work item" too, if it fixes the slab
> corruptions that Christoph reported.

Doesn't apply cleanly to the 4.8 tree, and the xfs_defer_finish()
code is quite different, so you'll need to rebase and resend that
patch if you think it needs to be applied to the 4.8-rc kernel.
I can always send it to Linus later.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>