| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: Propagate dentry down to inode_change_ok() |
| From: | Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:32:46 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20160809082756.GA11657@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1470223689-17783-1-git-send-email-jack@xxxxxxx> <1470223689-17783-2-git-send-email-jack@xxxxxxx> <20160809082756.GA11657@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Tue 09-08-16 01:27:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +static int
> > +xfs_vn_change_ok(
> > + struct dentry *dentry,
> > + struct iattr *iattr)
>
> Please don't use the _vn prefix for something that's not an
> actual inode operation (and we should do a mess rename to
> _iop one day as well.)
>
> > +int
> > +xfs_vn_setattr_nonsize(
> > + struct dentry *dentry,
> > + struct iattr *iattr)
>
> Same here.
So do you suggest xfs_iop_change_ok and xfs_iop_setattr_nonsize? I don't
really care, I just remember Dave had some ideas how names should be
consistent and this naming was his idea...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: Document error handlers behavior [V2], Carlos Maiolino |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: Propagate dentry down to inode_change_ok(), Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: Propagate dentry down to inode_change_ok(), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: Propagate dentry down to inode_change_ok(), Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |