| To: | "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 06/17] xfs: run xfs_repair at the end of each test |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:27:19 -0700 |
| Cc: | david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, eguan@xxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <146914481474.11762.2741429828012981240.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <146914477514.11762.3144320628851923350.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <146914481474.11762.2741429828012981240.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Run xfs_repair twice at the end of each test -- once to rebuild > the btree indices, and again with -n to check the rebuild work. This looks fine to me in general, but shouldn't we have specific tests that test the rebuilding in a normal auto run? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 05/17] common/reflink: actually test dedupe on scratch device, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 07/17] xfs/128: cycle_mount the scratch device, not the test device, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 05/17] common/reflink: actually test dedupe on scratch device, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 06/17] xfs: run xfs_repair at the end of each test, Darrick J. Wong |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |