xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix xfs_error_get_cfg for negative errnos

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix xfs_error_get_cfg for negative errnos
From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:52:55 +0200
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <9810c6bf-9fd7-bf41-13ab-a96bec861457@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <9810c6bf-9fd7-bf41-13ab-a96bec861457@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:32:17PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> xfs_error_get_cfg() is called with bp->b_error as an arg,
> which is negative, so the switch statement won't ever find
> any matches.
> 
> This results in only the default error handler having
> any effect, as EIO/ENOSPC/ENODEV get ignored due to the
> wrong sign.
> 
> It seems simplest to always flip the error sign to positive,
> so that we can handle either negative errors in bp->b_error,
> or possibly a positive errno via something like
> xfs_error_get_cfg(EIO) - this future-proofs the function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>

This looks the right thing to do for me too.

Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> 
> I'm still chasing down some odd behaviors in the error handling
> patches but this seems worth sending now :)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c
> index 4c2c550..79cfd3f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c
> @@ -634,6 +634,9 @@ xfs_error_get_cfg(
>  {
>       struct xfs_error_cfg    *cfg;
>  
> +     if (error < 0)
> +             error = -error;
> +
>       switch (error) {
>       case EIO:
>               cfg = &mp->m_error_cfg[error_class][XFS_ERR_EIO];
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

-- 
Carlos

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>