| To: | Marcin Sura <mailing-lists@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mkfs.xfs -d su=XXX,sw=YYY and future volume resize |
| From: | Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:46:47 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <CACNifpVsOMKQyshHk8B7WrmsbGAN_fOz6qpHLBTc_N=K1xY0Dw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Marcin Sura <mailing-lists@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <CACNifpVsOMKQyshHk8B7WrmsbGAN_fOz6qpHLBTc_N=K1xY0Dw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:19:02PM +0200, Marcin Sura wrote: > Hi, > When I create filesystem I can specify su and sw paramteres which match > underlying storage device. > So for example, If I have raid 6 volume made of 6 + 2 disks with stripe > size of 256k I create xfs with: > mkfs.xfs -d su=256k,sw=6 <disk> > But what if I will extend original volume by 2 disks. sw will 8. Will > be there a performance panelty compared to filesystem created from > scratch with correct sw parameter? > BR > Marcin Complementing Dave's answer, you can also mount the filesystem with new alignment configuration. You can use: sunit=value and swidth=value for mounting the FS with the new settings. man xfs for more info. Cheers > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs -- Carlos |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | How to Beat the Work-is-a-Drag Blues and Reduce Stress, Unmotivated to Work? |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | How to Form Great First Impressions and Display Confidence through Body Language, Body Language at Work |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mkfs.xfs -d su=XXX,sw=YYY and future volume resize, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mkfs.xfs -d su=XXX,sw=YYY and future volume resize, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |