xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: abstract block export operations from nfsd layouts

To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: abstract block export operations from nfsd layouts
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:23:24 +1000
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160713202104.GA10734@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6c1549ee874431c8293cad72c5f7382095277822.1467985684.git.bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx> <20160710094540.GA19392@xxxxxx> <20160713202104.GA10734@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 04:21:04PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:45:40AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:53:20AM -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> > > Instead of creeping pnfs layout configuration into filesystems, move the
> > > definition of block-based export operations under a more abstract
> > > configuration.
> > > 
> > > Changes from v1:
> > >   - dropped the first patch in the first posting
> > >   - renamed the config to EXPORTFS_BLOCK_OPS from BLOCK_EXPORT_OPS
> > >   - add an explicit default to no for EXPORTFS_BLOCK_OPS
> > >   - add some help and menu text
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/Kconfig          | 7 +++++++
> > >  fs/nfsd/Kconfig     | 2 ++
> > >  fs/xfs/Makefile     | 3 +--
> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_export.c | 2 +-
> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.h   | 4 ++--
> > >  5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> > > index 6725f59c18e6..ac6d3b36600c 100644
> > > --- a/fs/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> > > @@ -66,6 +66,13 @@ config FS_POSIX_ACL
> > >  config EXPORTFS
> > >   tristate
> > >  
> > > +config EXPORTFS_BLOCK_OPS
> > > + bool "Enable filesystem export operations for block IO"
> > > + default n
> > 
> > default n is the default, no need to add it.
> > 
> > Otherwise looks fine:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks.  Applied, with that one "default n" line dropped.
> 
> An ACK from Dave might also help reassure Linus I'm not stepping on
> anybody's toes.

Acked-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>