xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: iomap infrastructure and multipage writes V5

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: iomap infrastructure and multipage writes V5
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:28:39 +0200
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160628002649.GI12670@dastard>
References: <1464792297-13185-1-git-send-email-hch@xxxxxx> <20160628002649.GI12670@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:26:49AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Christoph, it look slike there's an ENOSPC+ENOMEM behavioural regression here.
> generic/224 on my 1p/1GB RAM VM using a 1k lock size filesystem has
> significantly different behaviour once ENOSPC is hit withi this patchset.

Works fine on my 1k test setup with 4 CPUs and 2GB RAM.  1 CPU and 1GB
RAM runs into the OOM killer, although I haven't checked if that was
the case with the old code as well.  I'll look into this more later
today or tomorrow.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>