Re: [PATCH 2/6] libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat

xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/6] libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat

To:	Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 2/6] libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 05:59:30 -0700
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20160618145349.GA17760@nyan>
References:	<cover.1452627740.git.felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> <20160112195945.GC568@nyan> <20160113075501.GC21939@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160113174241.GC10942@nyan> <20160114102009.GD27644@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160618145349.GA17760@nyan>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)

Sorr for not getting back to you.  It turns out that simply using
O_EXCL is fairly easy, but fitting it into a portabilitity framework
isn't.  So I think I'll have to give up on that attempt for now.

That being said I think ustat fits pretty well for this use case,
so getting rid of it might need a little more justification.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [PATCH 2/6] libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat, Felix Janda Re: [PATCH 2/6] libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat, Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 2/4] Simplify workaround for old glibc getsubopt(), Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:	Bug (?) : cumulative xfsrestore does not restore files and folders in a directory which was renamed, Damien Gombault
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH 2/6] libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat, Felix Janda
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 4/4] Move to more stdint types, Felix Janda
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]