xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 002/119] vfs: support FS_XFLAG_REFLINK and FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZ

To: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 002/119] vfs: support FS_XFLAG_REFLINK and FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:06:55 -0700
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160617121604.GB23661@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <146612627129.12839.3827886950949809165.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <146612628567.12839.3246258786290141903.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160617114117.GF19042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160617121604.GB23661@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:16:05AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> I'd take that a step further and suggest the entire series be split into
> independent feature series, as appropriate.

Yes, that's what I meant.  I just didn't manage to get to the rest yet.

> off the rmap bits for the time being. I'm just suggesting that if a
> repost is required from this point forward for any of the logical
> subunits (deps, rmap, reflink, scrub), I'd suggest to post, version and
> changelog those units independently.

Agreed.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>