On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup_int() only hits that ASSERT if it was given
> a name to rename, and failed to find the original. i.e. that should
> not happen.
>
> /*
> * Loop over all the entries with the right hash value
> * looking to match the name.
> */
>
> <do that loop>
> <fail to find the hash value for the name>
> <then:>
>
> ASSERT(args->op_flags & XFS_DA_OP_OKNOENT);
> /*
> * Here, we can only be doing a lookup (not a rename or remove).
> * If a case-insensitive match was found earlier, re-read the
> * appropriate data block if required and return it.
> */
>
> A rename should never fail to find the original name.
FYI, this looks very much the same like the Bug Daniel reported, which
I tried to help debugging in person over the weekend. His backtrace
points to cancelling a dirty transaction after xfs_dir_replace failed,
which most likely comes from the failing lookup, except that he probably
doen't have XFS_DEBUG enabled.
Given that 4.7-rc1 comes with the new shared locks for lookups, and
there are very little other changes I wonder if there is any relation
It would be good if Reinoud and/or Daniel can confirm that Linux 4.6
is ok.
|