xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map t

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 01:04:24 -0700
Cc: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <146424226290.6278.15051221437554845000.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <146424222237.6278.4174636124436241002.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <146424226290.6278.15051221437554845000.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
> --- a/src/t_immutable.c
> +++ b/src/t_immutable.c
> @@ -38,10 +38,10 @@
>  #include <libgen.h>
>  #include <sys/acl.h>
>  #include <attr/xattr.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <xfs/xfs.h>
>  #include <xfs/handle.h>
>  #include <xfs/jdm.h>
> -#include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/magic.h>
>  
>  #ifndef XFS_SUPER_MAGIC

How does this belong into the patch?

> diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group
> index f0ca410..0e34f9a 100644
> --- a/tests/xfs/group
> +++ b/tests/xfs/group
> @@ -288,3 +288,4 @@
>  853 auto quick clone
>  854 auto quick clone
>  855 auto clone
> +856 auto clone rmap reflink

This is the only test in the reflink group, how is this group different
from the clone one?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>