| To: | "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 May 2016 01:04:24 -0700 |
| Cc: | david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <146424226290.6278.15051221437554845000.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <146424222237.6278.4174636124436241002.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <146424226290.6278.15051221437554845000.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
> --- a/src/t_immutable.c > +++ b/src/t_immutable.c > @@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ > #include <libgen.h> > #include <sys/acl.h> > #include <attr/xattr.h> > +#include <linux/fs.h> > #include <xfs/xfs.h> > #include <xfs/handle.h> > #include <xfs/jdm.h> > -#include <linux/fs.h> > #include <linux/magic.h> > > #ifndef XFS_SUPER_MAGIC How does this belong into the patch? > diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group > index f0ca410..0e34f9a 100644 > --- a/tests/xfs/group > +++ b/tests/xfs/group > @@ -288,3 +288,4 @@ > 853 auto quick clone > 854 auto quick clone > 855 auto clone > +856 auto clone rmap reflink This is the only test in the reflink group, how is this group different from the clone one? |
| Previous by Date: | question about xfs/122, Xiao Yang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/7] xfs/104: don't enospc when ag metadata overhead grows, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record, Darrick J. Wong |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record, Darrick J. Wong |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |