| To: | Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_quota: check report_mount return value |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 May 2016 04:52:04 -0700 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20160512031500.GD17859@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1e8b9ace-2fa3-bc11-4487-19be60053ef9@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20160512031500.GD17859@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:15:00AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > Thanks for fix my mistake. I can add TERSE report functional > test into my xfs/106 patch(which you're reviewing). Then it > can find bugs likes this ASAP. Yes, please. Additional test coverage is always good. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_quota: check report_mount return value, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] libxcmd: generalize topology functions, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_quota: check report_mount return value, Zorro Lang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_quota: check report_mount return value, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |